@kyleknopp8093
I have seen the TR-3B which is def the daddy to this one. Mine was silent and hovering. Black triangle with glowing orbs in each corner underneath. Like it was its power source.
@tuvoca825
They were working on scramjet drones long ago. I had a professor who worked on ion propulsion engines. They have people working on warp engines with various... uhm... workarounds. Interesting stuff.
@CAM-wk3dj
Hopefully, as our forces operate this advanced equipment, they can be recognized and accredited with education credits leading to degrees❤️
@Kaladore82
I think I caught these on video. I recorded my video about 2 years ago. I am not sure but the size looks right and so does the description I provided at the time. They were flying about 500 feet from the ground. It was filmed in north central Washington.
@maj.kennethwithrow8390
This program was Axed in 2016, this story is eight years old.
@ECHSBACHS
Interesting
@CAM-wk3dj
People are always FIRST in ALL Missions💪
@Fifthmiracle
This program was cancelled in 2016, and the test aircraft have been in storage since 2017.
@kuyajectv7923
This is very possible with space x developing the Drone
@jimfulgham6866
I noticed in the video showing it taking off and landing on the Carrier that the sea state is flat as a pancake. How does it do with a rolling and pitching deck?
@brooksc900
A billion-dollar drone loses the war against a hundred thousand, 10,000-dollar drone swarm.
@sierrawander7108
Can the military produce anything under a billion dollars.
@kingrichee1817
2013 and we’re in 2024 🤔I wonder that they been doing since 🤔
@somedude288
This thing got shot down by Iran in I think 2018 Ish
@rokasb9441
6:30 looks like starship from Star Wars :0
@reedwoodland1522
It's the next step. Being 'cancled' in 2016 surely means there is no way it's happening now. surely.
@philipfreeman72
Got info on U.S. tic tac vehicles ?
@williamroberts6803
Um I think other drones have been launched from the deck of an air craft carrier. Smaller ones for sure.
@JillZeeee
First, Northrop does not assign the designator for the aircraft the DoD does. 2nd after the highly successful flight test of the air to air refueling, the navy decide that they wanted the X-47B converted to a fuel tanker to refuel the fighter jets. Northrop Grumman VP in charge of the X-47B let it be known that Northrop Grumman does not build tankers. The tanker project was moved to boeing. So far Boeing has been unable to reproduce the success of Northrop Grumman and the tanker is not as demanding as the X-47B fighter. There are a lot of errors and misrepresentation in this video.
@JillZeeee